Barb (rahirah) wrote,

Just deserts

Every now and then I see posts about how character X deserved better. I don't think there are many characters I haven't seen them for. I have mixed feelings about the concept, because most of the time they seem to be pushing the idea that all fictional characters ought to live their best and most comfortable lives, always making the right decisions, and never having anything really unpleasant happen to them.

I'm not a proponent of the idea that happy, functional characters can't be interesting, far from it. But I am perfectly fine with terrible things happening to them for the entertainment of the audience. I don't think that fictional characters deserve anything, being fictional and all. The people who deserve things are the audience, not the characters.

The audience deserves characters who are well-rounded and complex, who aren't sterotypes. The audience deserves a cast of characters which reflects its own diversity. The audience deserves protagonists who have agency. The audience deserves storylines that aren't lazy.

If the audience gets all those things... then sometimes, fictional characters will still have terrible things happen to them. But it will seem a lot less meaningless and insulting when they do.

comment count unavailable Rants Talk to me
Tags: writing

  • Books

    I'm reading Naomi Novik's new novel, A Deadly Education. It's sort of a Hunger Games for wizards, I guess. I get the impression that the author heard…

  • As things turned out

    I was indeed getting a cold, which I am just now kinda-sorta getting over. It never got bad enough to call in sick to work, of course, especially as…

  • On Being Ahead of One's Time, Until Time Catches Up

    I foolishly made a comment on Facebook the other day, to the effect that I used to love the Pern books, but couldn't enjoy them any longer, because…

Comments for this post were disabled by the author